Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Besharah

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:42, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Besharah

Angela Besharah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE search for other sources, the most useful thing I found in ProQuest is the same article.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be the subject of more proper coverage and analysis about her and her work in real media than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete using simple mentions of this name in an article about another person, or using articles that are simply passing mentions of the individual, don't help notability. Sources I find are all trivial mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 23:58, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just checked the sources, can agree with nom and others Karnataka (talk) 17:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.