Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous (film)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedied as a
]- Anonymous (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet any of the general notability guidelines yet, particularly
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:CRYSTAL are almost met. Wikipedia can be patient for a few weeks. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if filming actually starts next week. --Chuunen Baka (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, just because it's in production doesn't mean it still meets film notability guidelines. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 03:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 13:55, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Agree with incubation at least until filming begins. Doesn't meet WP:NFF yet, but the amount of media coverage on gnews, such as being mentioned in Empire magazine, shows that it almost certainly will be notable. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. It's a copyvio. Woogee (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio from where? The first line (or the second) of the article returns exactly 1 ghit, which is the article itself. [3] Grandmartin11 (talk) 01:04, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Funny. I get 226 hits, and I indicated in my speedy deletion tag that it's from imdb. Woogee (talk) 01:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.