Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Round (Fat Joe song)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:06, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another Round (Fat Joe song)
- Another Round (Fat Joe song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Concern was: No indication of passing WP:NSONG Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral
Redirect totalk) 05:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- What is the matter with this article? As stated it is an official single from an album yet to be released. Just because the album isn't out doesn't make the single less noteworthy it has its own cover art too. As for sources what else do you need besides straight from the artist themselves --Smush123 (talk) 17:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also if you look at the single from Rick Ross' unreleased album http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_Forgives,_I_Don't that has its own page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_the_Boss which further proves my point. --Smush123 (talk) 18:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The difference between this song and talk) 03:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Fair point it will probably chart sometime next week usually the minimum time for songs to enter charts is 1 week. Besides that though, aren't all album singles generally notable? I can give a couple more sources that mention this will be a single from the next album if that will remove the proposed deletion? --Smush123 (talk) 14:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Added another reference (MTV). What more do you want for this article to stay?--Smush123 (talk) 14:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The only problem is that charting and all doesn't entirely give it notability. Not every single is automatically notable. (talk) 04:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Every album I come across on here seems to have a separate page for the singles. I added another source to try and meet the guidelines which I am unable to understand why it doesn't according to yourself and Eeekster. Can you find an instance where an album's official single doesn't have its own page? So what happens when the time for deletion arrives? Does the article get reviewed by an admin who has final say whether it stays or goes? Who will be the admin for this? Could you please tell me also where the guidelines are for this as looking at (WP:NSONG) does not make it clear as far as I can tell this single is covered significantly in reliable sources. I hope it doesn't look like I think I own the article as that is certainly not the case I don't mind people editing it with more useful information as that is what I'd hope since I don't claim to know all. By the time this is reviewed for deletion I would think it would have charted in which case according to you will meet a requirement so what would be the point in deleting it now?--Smush123 (talk) 05:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- True, I guess it wouldn't hurt to give it at least another week to show the chart results and any potential notability, but you've got to understand that saying "these singles have articles" isn't really a good argument. Even so, it wouldn't be earth shattering to give this a little more time to prove notability. I'm not sure who the admin is that decides these, but if you make a good enough argument you can persuade them either way. You've argued your point well enough, so I'm changing my opinion to neutral over this. I'm not entirely convinced but it wouldn't hurt to give the song a little more time to chart or prove notability. talk) 07:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Is there a reason why, when logged out I cannot see the additional MTV reference I added but when I log in I can see it? I thought it might be my browsers cache but clearing it made no difference. Does anyone else see the MTV reference?--Smush123 (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Every album I come across on here seems to have a separate page for the singles. I added another source to try and meet the guidelines which I am unable to understand why it doesn't according to yourself and Eeekster. Can you find an instance where an album's official single doesn't have its own page? So what happens when the time for deletion arrives? Does the article get reviewed by an admin who has final say whether it stays or goes? Who will be the admin for this? Could you please tell me also where the guidelines are for this as looking at (
- The only problem is that charting and all doesn't entirely give it notability. Not every single is automatically notable. (
- Comment: The difference between this song and
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 06:31, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.