Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Areeka Haq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Areeka Haq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Popularity & Notability are not synonymous thus subject of article although popular is not notable as she lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. None of the sources used in the article establishes subject as a notable individual. The first source used is a mere announcement, the second lacks editorial oversight & all the rest do not seem to satisfy

WP:NACTOR either. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about her. Search results return either passing mentions or gossips about her. Perhaps a
WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Pakistan's major newspapers like
Bhuvan Bham being a social media influencer. They also have similar career years but there articles never got objections then surely Haq also met notability criteria. Libraa2019 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment — The editor above is the article creator. Celestina007 (talk) 17:06, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The subject may very well be notable, one day, as well as popular, but she currently fails
talk) 19:28, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Drafts by Mehmoodj1 - FWIW, this article subject has been created multiple times by a undisclosed paid editor who is also a sock operator. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb, thanks for bringing this to our notice. Celestina007 (talk) 12:02, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. The sources do not meet Wikipedia standards for "significant coverage from reliable news sources". Also being deleted multiple times on top of potential paid editing and sockpuppetry does not make anything look good here. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 03:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.