User talk:Libraa2019

Hi Libraa2019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Thora Sa Haq.jpg

Thanks for uploading

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Areeka Haq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Areeka Haq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Thank you for creating Abdullah Seja.

This article needs more references to satisfy notability for biography of living persons. What is needed are references giving significant coverage about this person, and independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are reliable -

WP:PRIMARY

which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources.

Pages of photographs, mentions of this person on pages about other topics do not garner notability.

A more comprehensive guide is

WP:BASIC

... People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Lack of attention to the above is likely to mean that the article may not be suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Libraa2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parhlo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parhlo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You claimed ownership of this file when uploading to Commons and stated a permission email was sent. This indicates you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of that page. What is your relationship with that person? CNMall41 (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdullah Seja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Seja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danial Afzal Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danial Afzal Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qudsia Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qudsia Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agha Mustafa Hassan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agha Mustafa Hassan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shah Sharabeel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Sharabeel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rishtay Biktay Hain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rishtay Biktay Hain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 23:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Look - I posted this here because I've observed you adding WP:OR as well sources that are clearly unreliable as citations on topics related to BLPs and Pakistan. It's important to remember that BLPs and Pakistan-related topics fall under

• I noticed you're still slipping in that WP:OR stuff with those placeholder references. Just a heads up, if you keep doing that, I might have to report it. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please show me i dont think i have added OR since then? Libraa2019 (talk) 02:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Here. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Saqib, Kindly check properly before accusing another user, you can clearly check in provided diff, i only moved Film section from bottom to top because films were fewer than television. According to you, moving the sections is WP:OR or is this the new way of insulting me? Libraa2019 (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • And what about this? I had to delete all this content because it seemed like you were trying to slip in WP:OR using placeholder references. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
          • You removed other basic info too in retaliation just because BLP was kept. Your edits at BLP after AFD closure says it all & i dont even have energy to argue with you thats why ignored it. BTW you posted about WP:OR on 15-May-24, do you any proof i have added OR after that? Libraa2019 (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
            • My removal makes sense because it was all just made-up stuff. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have never seen someone removed roles of an actor or ask for a source for a particular role [1]. It was totally retaliation and what are doing currently at this BLP is also retaliation. May be you are preparing for second nomination thats why removing all stuff to appear more strong for the next time. BTW As i said earlier, i dont have energy to consume on you so i will not reply you anymore. Libraa2019 (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted Saqib because what's stated in the lead passes

WP:V. S0091 (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Pinky Ka Dulha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinky Ka Dulha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • Saqib, carry on, may be you can get some peace of mind by doing these. Libraa2019 (talk) 16:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehboob Aapke Qadmon Main until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• • I can understand your situation Saqib, you dont want anyone to object your moves but unfortunately my articles received keep votes. Carry on, may be you can get some peace of mind. And i am not bother by the deletion of these articles which you are nominating as i am not UPE and neither fan of these TV dramas right now. Libraa2019 (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Don't take it the wrong way, okay? —Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • I did'nt & hope you get what you want by doing all these. If you want to make me upset then i am very much upset okay :) Libraa2019 (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Raja Ki Chandni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Ki Chandni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 17:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up. Once someone has responded to your comment, you shouldn't make major changes to it. Fixing typos is okay, but try to avoid making a lot of edits. I've noticed you've been doing this on multiple AfDs. Thanks! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:17, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Did'nt knew it before. Will avoid such thing in future. Libraa2019 (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Libraa2019, I know your intent is to be respectful but I suggest not referring to editors as sir unless you know they identify as male and prefer he/him type pronouns. You can look at their User page to see if they make it clear but for many editors, like me and you, their gender is not known. While personally I do not take offense if someone refers to me as sir, ma'am, he, she, etc. I have seen editors express great offense so best to be safe. I usually defer to they/them to be safe unless I know otherwise. S0091 (talk) 17:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oops my mistake, You are right. This thing never came into my mind. Thanks for the guidance. Libraa2019 (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]