Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argja Bóltfelag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Owen× ☎ 22:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Argja Bóltfelag

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-pro team, doesn't appear to meet

WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep, long and well-covered history, [1] and countless other sources. Geschichte (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Football, Denmark, and Islands. Skynxnex (talk) 21:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Long history, indeed; and it has been a first-division club in the Faroe Islands, whether or not it is semi-pro and fully professional is immaterial, as very, very few clubs in the Faroese system are fully professional. Anwegmann (talk) 02:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Faroese teams are fully professional, KÍ had 5 full-time players last season. As you say, though, the pro status is not the deciding factor when it comes to the clubs' respective cultural relevance within their country. It is however an unfortunate trend in Wikipedia to add the moniker "professional" to players and clubs to make them seem more important. The other day, I removed "professional" from a club in the El Salvador third division. It was obviously not true, and even when it is, a club only has one or very few teams that are professional when the rest (age-specific) are not. Geschichte (talk) 07:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - top-level team, clearly notable. The fact it is semi-pro is totally irrelevant. Giant Snowman 19:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per @Geschichte. Svartner (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.