Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arianna Dagnino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:55, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arianna Dagnino

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

autobiography. Only reference is her own website. She's removed all the others. Rathfelder (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 17:09, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Definitely
WP:BEFORE search. Creator of page has done much, it seems to keep this page from being deleted (eg. removing maintainence templates). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

@Rathfelder: By the way, keep in mind the pronouns used in your nom - the subject is a woman.

P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no notable works, awards or attention from reliable sources Spiderone 17:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be built on indepdent 3rd party sourcing, this article totally fails that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No major works or significant coverage. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.