Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Renowitzky (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Renowitzky

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Personal promo piece that has survived here since 2010 without any reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 11:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in addition it seems from the edit history that a number of 2016 edits were made by the subject of the article or someone closely related to his organisation. Mccapra (talk) 11:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:41, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. From what I see in my BEFORE, he doesn't pass SIGCOV. There are a few items covering his activism / speaking - but I don't see how this raises up to SIGCOV. Icewhiz (talk) 12:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regretful delete, I always regret deleting a Bio about someone doing good works. However, coverage I can find is limited to a few mentions and an article or two about him in the local paper.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I must agree with the previous voters. He has a compelling life story and is doing great work, but there is not enough
significant and reliable media coverage of him or his charity. And if the second of those was present, the article should be about the charity as an organization. Unfortunately, the article reads like a plea for donations, and while this charity certainly deserves donations, an encyclopedia is the wrong place to ask. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, simply not notable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.