Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attachment theory and psychology of religion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attachment theory and psychology of religion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

delete per

WP:NOTESSAY, it seems User:TaylorNewton is a lecturer who in 2012 got his students to upload their work. Barryob (Contribs) (Talk) 09:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 12:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 12:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a simple search gives some 146,000 hits while a Google Scholar search returns some 2,300. This is evidently a significant topic in psychology, and as such undoubtedly notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The source "Attachment, Evolution and the Psychology of Religion by Lee A. Kirkpatrick, 2005" indicates that the article is not only original synthesis. The study of religion from a psychology perspective is a notable topic. If there was not enough material for a separate article, another possibility would be to merge in psychology of religion. —Paleo Neonate – 00:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.