Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahiraṅga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Editors are free to undelete for the purpose of transwiki if Wiktionary wants this content. Sandstein 16:40, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bahiraṅga

Bahiraṅga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Yep, there's no underlying topic for an article here.
  WP:NOTDICT applies. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Transwikify to wiktionary. Mccapra (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwikify to Wiktionary as a dicionary definition. NonsensicalSystem^(err0r?)_(.log) 14:12, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I don't see why we'd traswiki a word in another language. Bearian (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2020 (UTC) P.S. I want to add that if this word represented a concept, I would go ahead and keep it. 15:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.