Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ban-manush

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ban-manush

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG due to lack of RS coverage. Current sources (Calcutta Review and Report on the Census) refer to a tribe, not a folkloric entity, however neither topic has received significant coverage outside of fringe sources. –dlthewave ☎ 20:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. this article low important and Not a philanthropic entity, but both subjects did not receive significant coverage beyond border sources. Fail
(T) 19:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom looking at the sources. Sure they are not 15 meters tall?—
eric 01:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - per nom. Fail
WP:GNG - MA Javadi (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - fails
WP:FRINGE. Bearian (talk) 23:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nominator. :bloodofox: (talk) 03:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.