User talk:MA Javadi

Welcome!

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simin Saberi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simin Saberi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I am awarding this barnstar for your recent, hard work making work previously only available on Farsi Wikipedia available in English. Thanks! Alarichall (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alarichall: Hello - Thank you for your concern on my work. glad to have you as my freind. - I hope I can contribute more to Wikipedia. - MA Javadi (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was looking for some small help.Recently I created a new article en:Kithaab i.e. es:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab ar:كتاب (مسرحية) to your Farsi (Persian) language wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator to get it translated in their own respective languages.

Thanking you , with warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MA Javadi,

Thanks for creating Wilhelm Eilers! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources independent of the subject, not its own website and immediate venues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Garden of Human Rights and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MA Javadi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MA Javadi, thank you for your comment on my article, you voted to delete on the article

Best, Jesusonogor (talk) 20:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Jean Kellens.

Based on Google Scholar citation counts, Kellens likely meets

WP:NACADEMIC

, but the article desperately needs citations to actual coverage of the subject and not just his publications.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MA Javadi,

Thanks for creating Leo Heinrich Skrbensky! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that

The three sources cited seem to make only brief mentions of the subject. Third-party references with more specific and detailed coverage would need to be added to show notability per

WP:GNG

.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nsk92 (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gherardo Gnoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Bromberger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Nations Special Rapporteur on Minority Issues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garnik Asatrian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Armenian and Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Garden of Human Rights, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Happy New Year!

MA Javadi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-

(T) 23:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@

NahalAhmed: - Hi I wish you a happy new year too. thanks - MA Javadi (talk) 23:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MA Javadi. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Censorship in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Hi, thanks for participating in last May's RfC (Request for Comment).

I wish to invite you to join a new one with the specific question of:

Should our lead sentence describe Bettelheim as a "self-proclaimed psychologist"?

RfC on lead sentence

started: Feb. 25, 2020

Any time and effort you wish to spend on this will be most appreciated. Thanks. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully: it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions here.

uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here

. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Vanamonde (Talk) 16:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reporters Without Borders, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, French and Spanish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

سلام دوست عزیز. لطفا نام بخش افزوده شده به مقاله سانسور اینترنت در ایران را مرتبط تر انتخاب کنید. با توجه به متن نوشته شده توسط شما، عنوان Emporting technology پیشنهاد میشود... همچنین این متن را مقاله Greatfirewall درقسمت exporting technology که نامی از ایران نوشته نشده است، بهتر است این متن در آنجا نیز نوشته شود. روز خوبی داشته باشید.

Arash00011 (talk) 11:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I will consider it. Thanks - MA Javadi (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freedom of the press, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Censorship in Poland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The word being used in the article is not a link to the disambiguation page Hercule

The correct word used is Hercules. MA Javadi (talk) 22:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haft Tappeh Sugarcane Agro-Industry Co., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shush.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 20:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have as much right to comment in Bahar's RFC as anyone else. When you first modified my comment to exclude it from the RFC, I thought it was an accident. But doing it again is inappropriate. My comment and findings belong in the RfC. Moving my comment out of the RfC is not OK.VR _talk 22:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Museum of Jordanian Heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Period.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 16:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Museum of Jordanian Heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - MA Javadi (talk) 11:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Hello @Onel5969: - Thank you for your attention to my articles. As this article exists in Wikipedia Arabic and Wikipedia Persian, I found it natural to have notability in English as well. And it looked no problem to me. But I will gladly follow your guide and add more resources to the article. I am very happy to get to know you and I consider you as my teacher in improving my articles. - MA Javadi (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MA Javadi, thanks. Remember different Wikipedias have different notability and referencing standards. English WP is one of the most stringent. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: - Thank you and I will do my best to improve the article. MA Javadi (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marek Jan Olbrycht has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass

WP:NSCHOLAR

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 21:52, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: - There is absolutely no connection between my user account and SalmanZ, and the checkuser confirmed this. Can you explain this block? What is the "big connection" you see between my user account and SalmanZ? - MA Javadi (talk) 11:06, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MA Javadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@JBW: There is absolutely no connection between my user account and SalmanZ, and the checkuser confirmed this. Can you explain this block? What is the "big connection" you see between my user account and SalmanZ? - MA Javadi (talk) 11:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns found at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SalmanZ. Yamla (talk) 12:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1. If you had said that there was some connection between the accounts but that you are not the same person, then I would have been sceptical, but would have been willing to consider your explanation of what the connection is. However, claiming that there is no connection is nonsense:there absolutely obviously is a connection.
2. Checkuser did not confirm that there is no connection; it just confirmed that there is no technical connection that is detectable by the checkuser tools. JBW (talk) 13:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: What is the "absolutely obviously" connection you see between my user account and SalmanZ? - MA Javadi (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, telling you that would serve no useful purpose, and would help you to know what giveaway signs to avoid if you ever use sockpuppets again. JBW (talk) 19:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MA Javadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked because of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SalmanZ. I addressed the the behavioral concerns at the SPI, while also the checkuser confirmed there was no connection between myself and SalmanZ. JBW insists that there is an "absolutely obvious" connection between myself and SalmanZ, a claim I find to be simply absurd. Request that another admin please review this. - MA Javadi (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even leaving aside the checkuser information(that I don't know and couldn't see anyway), the behavioral similarities are too strong to be a coincidence. 331dot (talk) 10:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another administrator will indeed review this. If that administrator can't see enough evidence to decide the issue, they will be welcome to ask me for a summary of the kinds of evidence I saw, which I will send by email. JBW (talk) 10:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW: There is absolutely no connection between my user account and SalmanZ, and the checkuser confirmed this. Can you explain this block? What is the "big connection" you see between my user account and SalmanZ? - MA Javadi (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @331dot, Yamla, and JBW: I am not a sock. MarioGom made this claim because I previously objected to extensive alterations on the article People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran. Now that he has successfully been able to remove some editors from that page, he has completely changed it. He is using the power of administrators to suppress editors who hold opposing views. - MA Javadi (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @331dot, Yamla, and JBW: Hello, almost 5 months have passed and I am still waiting for my account to be opened. As I said before and the check user has confirmed, I have never been a sock puppet and do not agree with such activity. Behavioral similarities may be because my English is poor and I tried to imitate other users’ writings. If you think I have to be punished for weakness in my English, 5 months is enough. This has already damaged my reputation. MA Javadi (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to lift your block. But you know how to make an unblock request.

WP:GAB explains how to do so, if you've forgotten. Note that simply waiting five months is not sufficient. --Yamla (talk) 14:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]