Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandy Kiki

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bandy Kiki

Bandy Kiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable blogger. The claim of "first Cameroonian to come out as lesbian" is both unsourced and unlikely.

π, ν) 18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Seems pretty notable from what I can turn up - however, needs a serious cleanup for referencing and general BLP issues, as it seems she is a bit of a controversial figure. The Drover's Wife (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and clean up as it demonstrates notability, but the controversial claim that she is the first out lesbian from Cameroon is... unsourced at the very least. --Theredproject (talk) 22:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete sources do not rise to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:18, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The aspect of been the first Cameroonian lesbian has been cleanup~~Abanda bride~~

  • Keep She has been profiled by
    WP:GNG ("If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list"). Lonehexagon (talk) 04:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The keep votes are poor. What sources are we relying on?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 13:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Theredproject and others. While it seems the article needs better referencing, the subject seems to merit a Wiki article. ExRat (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hate to relist a third time but the first relist had a pointed comment that was not addressed. What are the reliable sources that are the basis of the keep votes?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.