Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Kenya relations

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Bangladesh–Kenya relations

Bangladesh–Kenya relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2016. The cited sources are three government press releases (upon the appointment of an ambassador, upon his presenting his credentials, and when one leader sent a congratulatory message to the other upon her re-election), and one 2012 article speculating that Kenya would buy US$8M worth of jute from Bangladesh "soon".

Relations are much the same as Bangladesh has with most countries: no state visits, no bilateral agreements, and negligible economic ties. The Atlas of Economic Complexity shows 2015 bilateral exports from Bangladesh at $9M (0.03% of total), and from Kenya at $11M (0.2% of total).[1][2]

Insufficient coverage in third party, reliable, secondary sources to meet

WP:GNG. Possibly merge to Foreign relations of Kenya, although I don't see anything more than diplomatic boilerplate here. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:52, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.