Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bankelal

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. We can't keep relisting this forever. We have 2 to keep, and 2 to merge, with the original nominator not expressing an opinion, we have several new refs being added by some of the keep !voters. Closing as no consensus. ST47 (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bankelal

Bankelal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD rationale was "Non-notable character article with little to no chance of being sourced." But I'm taking this to AFD for input on a merge or redirect.

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
Comment - the above was written before the new sources added. I don't have the skills to properly judge the new sources. The article is in dire need of clean up, but AfD is not clean up. From the info currently presented in the article, I still believe a merge might be the best option, but I wouldn't oppose a refund for something more substantive and encyclopedic. --Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "जल्दी ही पर्दे पर आने वाला है 'नागराज'". News18 India. November 4, 2017.
  2. ^ "आठ आने की कॉमिक्स अब लाख की". BBC News हिंदी.
  3. ^ DelhiAugust 3, India Today Tech New; August 4, 2018UPDATED; Ist, 2018 00:17. "No, Amazon India these are not the Hindi comics we are looking for". India Today. {{cite web}}: |first3= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ "कॉमिक्स : हर घर में रहते थे ये चाचा, गुदगुदाती हैं इनकी बातें". www.patrika.com.
  5. ^ Srivastav, Vaibhav (March 20, 2017). "Introducing : Bankelal!".
  6. ^ "Tinkle to Doga: 11 amazing comic books every 90s kid will remember reading". September 26, 2017.
  7. ^ "bankelal". Navbharat Times. April 21, 2014.
  • Keep. I added new refs and cleaned out some of the most egregious directory information that I don't think belonged. (But even so:
    WP:NOTCLEANUP.) There are other references that discuss this topic, like [1], [2], [3], but they're scholarly articles behind a paywall, so I haven't been able to use them to source any statements rn. Ford MF (talk) 22:13, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 15:39, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Piotrus The series that he features in is called Bankelal series. If you are referring to the comics publisher then that would be Raj Comics. If you have found that the comic book series he features in is notable then IMHO that is another positive opinion to keep this article. --DBigXray 11:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
At this point it's more of a technicality - character =/= comic book series. One of those topics is likely notable, but I don't think both are, and from what I see the series may be more notable than the character, which would suggest a need to rewrite the article a bit. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:21, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Improving the article or renaming/rewriting it should be discussed on the article talk page and not on the AfD page. per
WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. The question right now is should Wikipedia contain an article on this and the answer is yes. --DBigXray 08:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.