Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beam Privacy
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on
"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
]
Beam Privacy
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Beam Privacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet notability guidelines - most of the sourcing is about underlying technologies rather than the product itself. firefly ( t · c ) 06:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. firefly ( t · c ) 06:50, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Apart from it not being at all obvious that this passes WP:RS in many of the alleged references. I agree with the nom thatch of this is about the underlying tech rather that the topic itself. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.