Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaver contest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 17:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beaver contest

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article about a contest or initiative. No evidence of notability. Fails

WP:EVENTCRIT. - Mr X 15:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as per nom and the article fails
WP:GNG--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Like said above fails
WP:GNG. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an
incomprehensible word salad. Bearian (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as
WP:TOOSOON. If others find good RS, I'm happy to change my recommendation. --Mark viking (talk) 23:28, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete I tried to fix this - got rid of some copyvio, etc, but couldn't find anything making it notable, hence the tag I added. I agree with Mark viking, it's too soon and not yet notable enough.
talk) 11:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.