Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Snell Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college football player. Does not meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:32, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep He has received national coverage per
  WP:BLP. SportingFlyer talk 07:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep In my opinion, it's not worth deleting the page and then recreating it when he (almost inevitably) gets drafted into the NFL and officially meets
  WP:NGRIDIRON. He could choose to turn pro at the end of this season and we are recreating a page for him in six months, which seems redundant to me. If I have some time soon I will try to add more sources and prose to it. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep More than enough coverage in sources to show this subject meets WP:GNG . Like this article from Yahoo Sports. JC7V-constructive zone 04:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Plenty of coverage to show that this individual meets
  WP:BASIC, as stated above. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep clearly enough coverage to pass
  WP:GNG. It should be incorporated into the article, but that's an editing issue and not a deletion issue.--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:12, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.