Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benny Tijerina Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:38, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Tijerina Jr.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from the fact that this article is terribly written, Tijerina and the crime have received little to no meaningful coverage and there is only some minor fanfare now due to a Netflix documentary being released. This fails

WP:NCRIME and I'd guess NMURDERER if that were a real thing. Praxidicae (talk) 21:28, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I fixed the "horribly written" paragraphs. Ehh, I admit, It is really shitty. But I did my research the best I can. And by that, I mean I just remembered some things from the documentary and looked up some news articles about him. At least there is some reliable sources, not shit from random websites.

User:Junkrak January 11, 2020 21:36pm (UTC)

I beg to differ re:"the fix" but that's another matter. A local crime (or criminal) that has received virtually no meaningful outside coverage isn't notable. Praxidicae (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS. Michepman (talk) 04:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:NOTNEWS. Parts of the case could possibly be saved and then merged with Henry Lee Lucas#Discredited as an example. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Terrible, but this
No ongoing coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - For now. Re-create if more information and coverage becomes available. But for now it does not cover WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
^{• whaddya want? •} 09:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.