Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bilderberg Hotel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
(non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
]
Bilderberg Hotel
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
Phil Bridger: Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Merge Not enough to be notable on its own, but as part of the bilderberg meetings page makes sense, that way in context and not lost. User talk:Davidstewartharvey
- I haven't examined the results yet, but these searches should eliminate most sources that are about the Bilderberg meetingor other hotels in this chain but retain any that are about this hotel itself:
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Phil Bridger (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)]
- Do you see any that are not in passing mentions? I don't. The stuff like "Madonna stayed in hotel x" does not confer notability to said hotel, per WP:NOTINHERITED.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)]
- No, I don't. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)]
- No, I don't.
- Do you see any that are not in passing mentions? I don't. The stuff like "Madonna stayed in hotel x" does not confer notability to said hotel, per
- Comment Builderberg group is notable for sure. Not sure about the hotel. The first meeting of this group happened in this hotel so the name of the group. -- Dr. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Merge to group as part of its history. (Minimalizing current status of this building)Djflem (talk) 07:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
- Merge or redirect. Apart from this meeting the only things about this hotel that seem to be mentioned by non-directory sources are that it was close to some action in World War II, which is true of very many places in Europe, and that it has hosted an Integrated Natural Resources Management conference (oh, and of course Madonna stayed there). I'm not sure that there's really anything to merge, but whether there is or not this should be redirected to Phil Bridger (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)]
- Keep I would like to keep it as I think it adds something in terms of understanding the origins of the group and how it was named. I feel detail will be lost over time if it is merged. John Cross (talk) 19:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Plese see WP:ITSIMPORTANT. --02:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
- Plese see
- Merge and redirect. Looks like the hotel is solely known for its relationship to the ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.