Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioscrypt Inc.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to L-1 Identity Solutions. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Bioscrypt Inc.
Can't find any coverage beyond press releases for this company. Sam Walton (talk) 21:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment If it is true that they are the market-share leader for their field, we should always have an article on the largest, most significant company in an industry, even if we only have enough source material for a stub. That being said, this information about being the largest in the industry is cited to a press release saying an analyst firm made the claims and I am not familiar with how credible the analyst firm is. CorporateM (Talk) 05:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Response to comment - IMS appears to be quite reputable. A News search shows that they are very frequently cited, by notable and reputable sources. And their report, "The World Market For Electronic Physical Access Control Equipment" is done periodically, (latest one I could find was 2013), and quoted in numerous industry sources. That said, I could find no link to the 2007 report, or to any of the actual reports. RS articles which mention the reports (which I could find) all point to the 2013 report. Other PRs from other firms note other years of the report (2012, 2008). But without independent corroboration, that claim should be struck from the article, if the article remains. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Merge - A news search returned only press releases; Newspapers returned zero results; Books returned quite a few results, but all of a tangential or listing nature, which does not rise to fulfilling WP:BASIC; Highbeam returned results which are either non-substantial, or of press release nature; and JStor returned zero results. That said, I think there is enough independent citation to include the non-promotional aspects of this article in the L-1 Identity Solutions article. Onel5969 TT me 15:34, 13 August 2015 (UTC)]
- Merge to ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.