Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biotech industry in Boston
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. There's concern about this being poorly named, but there's clear consensus to keep it. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Biotech industry in Boston
The article is a collection of internal links.
talk) 19:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
]
- Keep. First, if an article subject has potential to include more information, it doesn't need to be deleted. It can be improved. That's why we don't delete every stub article. Second, WP:PURPLIST, says "Lists which contain internally linked terms (i.e., wikilinks) serve, in aggregate, as natural tables of contents and indexes of Wikipedia." Natureium (talk) 21:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Keep. As above, would appear to have the potential to be a good article. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Lepricavark (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Lepricavark (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Lepricavark (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Lepricavark (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Lepricavark (talk) 01:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Comment. The article could be renamed as a list if it meets the notability criteria. While the last editions were a significant contribution for the content, per talk) 16:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)]
- Keep Important tech topic that meet WP:GNG by decent coverage in reliable sources Business Insider, The Economist. And the article has even more, including sources from Nature which all discuss the topic directly. I agree it needs to be renamed to use formal term " Biotechnology" instead of informal "Biotech" but that's not issue of AfD, it would be done later. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.