Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black icon (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black icon (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music act. Sources either don't mention the subject or are blogs. Blackguard 16:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 16:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 16:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For the reasons stated by Blackguard. David.thompson.esq (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of reliable secondary sources, or even cursory mentions [1] Wisdom89 _{(_T / ^C)} 17:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I simply see no better improvement. Pinging Wikicology and Jpbowen. SwisterTwister talk 04:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sadly, no evidence of
t@lk to M£ 05:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - searches did not show anything that meets either
WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.