Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoAt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BoAt

BoAt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - would qualify for speedy deletion as a company not demonstrating any significance.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   12:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - repeat what I said when PROD this: Fails
  WP:ORGCRIT requirements of in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Article mention little about the company.Itsabouttech (talk) 18:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Due to routine and public relation esque sources which show it doesn't have depth to pass
  WP:NCORP. IlluminatingTrooper (talk) 06:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.