Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boston Open
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Boston Open
- Boston Open (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disambiguation page with one internal link to a prodded page, and two external links. Delete. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 12:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if the proded page Boston Go Open is deleted. If not, merge and redirect to Boston Go Open. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You re in a wrong place. ]
- Dab pages typically come to AfD, I thought. You're thinking of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion? cab (talk) 07:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I think this shall in AfD and not MfD.]
- Dab pages typically come to AfD, I thought. You're thinking of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion? cab (talk) 07:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per the statements above. Hot gorgeous Asian babes (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There are two internally linked pages. Unless one of those is deleted, this dab page should remain. Rlendog (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unnecessary dab page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 03:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I was tempted to say keep as a dab page - but there really isn't enough to disambiguate between. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Dab page that isn't really required - not enough ambiguity between the three items herein. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.