Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradshaw Mountain High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Synergy 13:58, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bradshaw Mountain High School

Bradshaw Mountain High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Does Not Seem Any Difrent for any other high school CelesJalee (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Question I was under the impression that all high schools (or equivalent) were considered inherently notable. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep—Seems sufficiently notable. Being different seems an odd criteria for notability.—RJH (talk)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.
• Keep. The article now has enough references. --Eastmain (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on added references which might of made a difrence. Mandsford (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep based on recent revisions which demonstrate notability (in the Wikipedia sense). JBsupreme (talk) 20:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep not only as a high school but because sufficient sources are available to easily meet
  talk) 00:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep All high schools are to be considered inherently notable. There is no requirement to "be different". Being as it is not different, it should be kept like ALL other high school articles. The article has sufficient references for verifiability of its encyclopedic content. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Its more clear with the new sources. CelesJalee (talk) 13:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.