Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brando Advertising Agency
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
]Brando Advertising Agency
- Brando Advertising Agency (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notable, no assertion of notability, refs contain passing mentions or recitations of press releases, fails
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- N/A0 23:56, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 14:01, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no gnews, many of the references seem to be dead. This article was prev. speedied (G11), which was overturned: SPA, who I would bet works for Brando. They have added information on only Brando's page, and companies who are presumably advertising with Brando. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 17:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only claims for subminimal significance are minor trade awards, which fail to establish cultural, historical, or technical significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.