Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Toropov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

Brandon Toropov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non notable person per

• Delete. I guess that "wrote the influential X" is enough of an assertion to bypass speedy, but there are no
  independent sources attesting to notability. (There certainly seem to be plenty of these marginally-notable Muslim converts on Wikipedia; has anyone investigated whether they're being entered by the same person or group? Seems like a POV-pushing project.) --Dhartung | Talk 21:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete non notable, and probably factually inaccurate. I woneder if this is the same person as User:BrandonYusufToropov?--Sefringle^Talk 02:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is. -- Karl Meier 05:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Obvious Keep after reading Sefringle's comments.--Fâtimâh bint Fulâni 03:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC) Sock puppet of Kirbytime[reply]

I voted delete.--Sefringle^Talk 04:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not familiar with the article's history.--Fâtimâh bint Fulâni 04:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Fâtimâh bint Fulâni is most probably another sock of Kirbyftime. I'm filing a checkuser. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 04:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete!: Non-notable and all OR with no sources. --Matt57 ^{(talk•contribs)} 04:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable, no sources.Proabivouac 06:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable, no sources, has always bugged the hell out of me. BYT 23:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't figure you'd want this hanging around…at least I certainly wouldn't want an article here about me in the current wiki environment. If people are out to get you, they don't delete your bio, they rewrite it.Proabivouac 23:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment As the subject of this unwanted and unsourced bio has indicated a desire to see it gone, speedy delete and close is appropriate per BLP.Proabivouac 23:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.