Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Break machine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I note that those supporting deletion did so before the additions by

Break machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

• Queried speedy delete {{db-bio}}. Anthony Appleyard 22:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Obviously fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC.
  Talk 22:04, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Per above mentioned guidelines. - Rjd0060 22:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep A side project of
  WP:MUSIC. This wasn't very clear from the original article — it was a translation from French — but it did mention "phenomenal success", and the first hit on a Google search for "break machine" (other than the YouTube video) mentions the multimillion sales, which can be confirmed by further searching. I'm left wondering what the "delete" votes are based on, unless they're from a country which censors Google. Thomjakobsen 01:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Obviously passes WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC, confused why this was even brought here. 81.153.168.73 04:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Did the nominator check at all for notabilty before nominating. Tons of references online. Article needs to be rewritten, but artist passes
  WP:Music —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridernyc (talk • contribs) 16:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.