Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Ong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 00:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Ong

Brian Ong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views

)

Non-notable. No references in article. This person is only notable for his death; nothing else. Davnel03 20:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. DrWarpMind 00:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete He's only a trainee wrestler, notable only for his death. The info isn't important enough to stand on its own. Merge any info to Great Khali or APW. DrWarpMind 20:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it can be covered in The Great Khali's article. Nikki311 20:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possibly even
  WP:CSD#A7. Not a memorial. --UsaSatsui 21:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, a pointless article. Gavyn Sykes 21:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one of the worst failures of the notability policy I've ever seen short of newpage patrolling. The Hybrid 22:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete.
  radio me!) 22:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge into Khali's or APW's article *only* if a reliable valid source can be found for the info. If not, delete it as libel. --Naha|^(talk) 00:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Everything important from here is already in The Great Khali's article (with a source). GaryColemanFan 03:47, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete / Merge as per above.
  TB LS 04:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - not notable. Iamchrisryan 14:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - is only good for a trivia answer User:SpeedyC1SpeedyC1 19:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable, we're not a memorial site, etc.
  Burntsauce 22:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• This should be speedy deleted as libel unless reliable sources are provided immediately. Even if the sources are found, at best this should be a footnote in All Pro Wrestling and/or Dalip Singh. Corvus cornix 20:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Limited coverage found, primarily Bay Area, though there were a few wire stories. If sourced merge to All Pro Wrestling, but a separate article probably isn't supportable. --Dhartung | Talk 20:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.