Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Redemption
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 05:16, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- California Redemption (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is admittedly, a difficult one to do
WP:GNG. What little coverage they have is local, they were never signed to a major label as far as I can tell and the reviews included here aren't from major outlets. As an example, earcandymag is a two sentence blurb and I'm honestly not convinced that this is a significant source for anything, let alone this. The rest are fanzines, blogs, forums or otherwise not sources which would establish notability. Praxidicae (talk) 15:20, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 16:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 01:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 01:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails criteria for WP:BAND. Not notable (no competitions, major label releases, members not independently notable). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actaudio (talk • contribs) 23:30, 5 March 2019 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.