Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camberwell Road, Melbourne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was mixed result. Camberwell Road and Riversdale road are delete while Camberwell Junction has a keep consensus. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camberwell Road, Melbourne

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't show notability and I couldn't find anything else after a Google search to prove that it warrants its own article. Suonii180 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC) Adding[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero evidence of notability; how on earth this has lasted 13 years, I will never know Spiderone 19:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What utter junk. What Spiderone said. Spiderone and Suonii180 I have added Riversdale Road, Melbourne by the same author to this as a nearby road and junction with similar lack of notability. Reywas92^Talk 00:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Camberwell Junction - it's a listed place on the Victorian Heritage Register and there are sources about it, so the Google search the nominator apparently did wasn't particularly good (I found this with less than a minute of searching for it), e.g. here. Reywas92, calling something "utter junk" is not helpful, just say something is notable or not instead of name-calling. Deus et lex (talk) 02:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to agree with this keep although it means rewriting this as a completely different article about a historic district (which incidentally is not in Melbourne). As it stands there's no claim to notability, so it's not terribly surprising that people took that at face value. The others should be deleted. Mangoe (talk) 04:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but just to correct you, Camberwell Junction is in Melbourne (it's in the suburbs). Deus et lex (talk) 11:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More precisely, it's in the City of Boroondara, which is (as best I understand it) a subunit of Melbourne. Mangoe (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Camberwell Junction There's a notable subject there with a poorly developed article, see [1]. The other two roads are unsourced and non-notable. SportingFlyer T·C 00:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.