Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camilla Di Giuseppe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:57, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla Di Giuseppe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG without multiple, independent sources covering the subject in-depth. User:Namiba 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. User:Namiba 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. User:Namiba 14:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable broadcast journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Not notable television personality....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per John Pack Lambert. 2001:569:74D2:A800:4422:FAA9:E88D:89F0 (talk) 05:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, television journalists are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because their own staff profiles on the
self-published websites of their own employers offer technical verification that they exist — the key to making a journalist notable enough for Wikipedia is to reference it to coverage about her in independent sources, such as books and other media outlets that don't issue her paycheque. But besides her staff profile, the only other source used here at all is IMDb, which is also not a reliable or notability-clinching source either. The article states nothing about her (e.g. winning a noteworthy journalism award) that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, per Bearcat mostly. No independent sources about her, the journalist. PK650 (talk) 22:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.