Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CapAcadie.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 10:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
CapAcadie.com
Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH. Tagged as possibly non-notable since 2011. Kleuske (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the missfortune 03:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the missfortune 03:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the missfortune 03:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)]
- Redirect to WP:NMEDIA as a significant daily newspaper — but this is just its former website (which it still has, but just not at this name anymore), not a separate article topic in any sense. Who in the honk ever thought it needed a separate article? Bearcat (talk) 05:11, 17 December 2017 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- not independently notable of L'Acadie Nouvelle and there's no need for a redirect from the name of the website to the org. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to find evidence that this is presently connected to WP:V. I can't see merging any of this content to L'Acadie Nouvelle without verification in reliable sources. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.