Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capital League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:41, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Capital League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for over a decade and I can't find anything to support it, it's interesting but fails

WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 15:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 15:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 15:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete unsourced and fails
WP:GNG Eopsid (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete
WP:V. Chetsford (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

delete might be more suitable for an online sports almanac, suggest enthusiastic editors
try another wiki.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. Cbl62 (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.