Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centrifugal Force Misconceptions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -

Centrifugal Force Misconceptions

Part of a series of articles, unencyclopedic apprach to the subject which is explained better and more accurately on the Centrifugal force page. Delete --

• Merge to
  Centrifugal Force. Onebravemonkey 08:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, can't see anything worth merging, especially not in the "Overcoming" section. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep, i think you're right. It goes into a bit more detail than the subsection in
    Centrifugal Force does, but the extra information is a bit superfluous. The subsection can stand on its own, so delete. Onebravemonkey 09:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Delete Redundant with centrifugal force. TheronJ 18:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Better explanations at centrifugal force. (Some educators see incorrect assumptions as valuable learning tool. In the scientific method it is called hypothesis development.) --Infrangible 01:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Redundant and worse than centrifugal force. Salsb 16:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.