Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chigan Madu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Chigan Madu

Chigan Madu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

speedy deleted previously, fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Might need to fast track this one again. Non-notable per guideline
  Talk) 21:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete – the article creator created a draft that was rejected several times in AfC if memory serves, before having it deleted earlier today. This is no more notable than the draft was. As pointed out the article creator, the sources are press releases, in fact, there are three copies of the same press release in there, and it is rather hilarious to see how the same press release was apparently pushed out in two subsequent years – here he "avows" that "...the year 2019 has been good for him so far. “I have pushed out some contents this year [...]"" and here and here he "disclosed" that "...2020 has been a fruitful year for him. Speaking on that he shares, “I have pushed out some contents this year [...]" ". If we were not sure whether he was notable or not, that clinches it. --bonadea contributions talk 22:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above; also, the article is clearly intended to promote and is written like a CV Spiderone 23:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Obviously fails
  WP:FILMMAKER. -- LACaliNYC✉ 22:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, Per above, does not meet notability. Alex-h (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no significant coverage. Peter303x (talk) 02:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.