Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitwanix OS

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation if and when there are sufficent

WP:TOOSOON anymore. The Bushranger One ping only 14:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Chitwanix OS

Chitwanix OS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New software (released last month) with no sign of

WP:NOTABILITY yet. Only 85 ghits, most generated by the creators, or databases of software. Only one gnews hit, a passing mention. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment: The problem here is not promotion, but rather a lack of notability. Wikipedia is not a place to establish notability; we only include subjects whose claims to notability have been supported by a number of independent, reliable sources - see
WP:RS. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 12:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment: Thank You for suggesting me guys, I appreciate your comment and I have a conclusion what I learned from you guys is that, I need to provide you the sources for the article, isn't it?. And the source can be a website right?. As, I am a member of developer team I alone can also be a source, but if you need the reliable source i.e. our official site. Our site is underconstruction and all the information will be also included there throughly with 24 hours. So, please approve the page and lets not delete the page. Please give me permission to remove the tag.--Pyasi.arun (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The sites you list are a personal blog, a reproduction of a press release, and what seems to be the Facebook page for the effort. None of this indicate that this is a notable project. We are not trying to hurt your feelings, we are just trying to maintain Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. If the article is deleted now, that does not mean that an article on the subject cannot be created later, once the OS has received sufficient attention. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Dude so, what do you really want.? please make me clear!!!--Pyasi.arun (talk) 16:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it was only recently released and it's not a product backed by a major company, it likely has not yet received the
    WP:TOOSOON may apply. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Dude, this OS is a free and Open Source Linux Based Operating system, and this is supported by FOSS Community Nepal and SPARC Incorporation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyasi.arun (talk • contribs) 03:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you read
    WP:RS in that they have editorial oversight (i.e. not just someone's blog). As it stands this article does not have third party sources, so under Wikipedia policy it cannot be retained as an article, because the subject is not notable. - Ahunt (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chitwanix_OS&oldid=1137706308"