User talk:Davidwr

Consistent with the Terms of Use, Davidwr has been banned indefinitely by the Wikimedia Foundation from editing all Wikimedia sites. Please direct any questions to cawikimedia.org. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Category:AfC pending submissions by age has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Qwerfjkltalk 19:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Pennsylvania Glee Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Pennsylvania Glee Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former or old logos has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:George Floyd protests map/US has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Stockholmståg color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you commented on Hovhannes Shiraz House-Museum talk page stating: "Please re-write the sections that are a close match for the given source. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)". My question is, given that the source (http://shiraz.am/en/static/3/) no longer exists, can the template message be removed? If so, could I kindly ask that you do so. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenshirazd (talk • contribs)

Hello Davidwr! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to

Template:East Midlands Railway colour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Wild is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Wild until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Say it ain't so, Joe (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the