Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Michaels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Michaels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability established, sources are lists of winners/losers which in itself is not significant independent coverage to establish notability as a wrestler. Working in ECW before it was more than a regional indy fed does not make him notable for just working there. MPJ -US 02:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. NiciVampireHeart 10:49, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability established as two-time tag team champion in what was, at the time, a top (if not the top) independent promotions (USWA). #242 ranking in PWI 500 helps solidify notability. GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If an (admittedly before they hit their stride) ECW championship isn't enough to match GNG, I think a USWA championship does the job. He also has a remarkably high 2002 PWI number considering we don't have anything in the article about him during that period. That's probably our fault though, not his.LM2000 (talk) 07:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. While admitally I don't know a ton about wrestling, he seems to be at the point where he's notable. Kharkiv07 ^Talk 21:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.