Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromatic scale for flute
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Chromatic scale for flute
- Chromatic scale for flute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A pedagogical tool being promoted by its creator. No evidence that anyone else uses it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence that this is different from any other chromatic scale for any other instrument. Guy's just trying to get his name on the internet. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No sources other than WP:SPS by the creator of the topic. Nothing at all found in a Google search. The notability of the creator (Daniel Theaker) is in question; note that his bio is currently being considered for deletion on grounds of non-notability. Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: Daniel Theaker was considered for speedy deletion in 2006, and apparently was deleted (and then recreated soon after without anyone noticing?) — not currently under consideration for deletion, but I imagine it probably should be. Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: Daniel Theaker bio has since been deleted yet again. User:Racehorse87 (talk · contribs) 16:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Correction: Daniel Theaker was considered for speedy deletion in 2006, and apparently was deleted (and then recreated soon after without anyone noticing?) — not currently under consideration for deletion, but I imagine it probably should be. Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — --Darkwind (talk) 05:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Author is trying to take public credit for transcribing a chromatic scale in what he claims is a unique format. It's not unique. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.