Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic trance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to talk) 01:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Classic trance
- )
- The article is a stub and it is unsourced for more than half a year.
- Google.Books search on "classic trance" results 1 trivial mention of "classic trance" and it never claims it is a particular type of music.
- Google web search on "classic trance" returns about 134k results; 10 first pages with results do not contain anything reliable on "classic trance". Moreof, while analysing search results, I have noticed that "classic trance" is very often used as general descriptor (eg, "classic trance tunes"). -- Appletangerine un (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - This does seem to be a style of music which many bands associate themselves with, I'm just unable to find any sources dealing with the subject itself. If I or anyone else finds any, I'll change my vote to a keep. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to trance music. Not really anything to merge. I notice that other subgenres are already tagged to be merged. — Gwalla | Talk 20:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
- Redirect to Trance music. Not a whole lot of content, and, as Gwalla said, the other Trance subgenres have already been tagged for a merge.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 13:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect This subgenre doesn't need its own page. Angryapathy (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.