Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudio Parra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While there is less discussion here of the substance of the sources than I would like, the arguments that the sources in the article provide significant coverage are not obviously wrong, and so I cannot close this any other way. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:44, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio Parra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Chilean musician with no notability outside band. Was previously redirected to

WP:BANDMEMBER. John B123 (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. John B123 (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. John B123 (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. John B123 (talk) 17:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think he is absolutely notable, the article might need more accurate references but he is one of the most important keyboardist of the history of Latin America. I guess that hundreds of pornstars and third division soccer players are more notable than him?. Tommy Boy (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @
  WP:INHERITED notability? Richard3120 (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Keep Although sources are influenced by his Jaivas membership, Parra is a prominent keyboardist and merits his own article, as he is notable by himself. I found several sources, such as that of Música Popular and some books, which go into detail on his work. --Bedivere (talk) 23:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If you read the references in spanish, you can notice he is a stand out musician, which is explicitly said: Claudio Parra is undoubtedly one of the most transcendent Chilean musicians of the last 50 years. Tommy Boy (talk) 15:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- As part of Los Jaivas, yes. You still haven't shown how he is notable outside of the band. Richard3120 (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Los Jaivas as per nom. If, as has been suggested by the keep votes, he was such an outstanding musician, he would have more in-depth coverage of him outside the band. As it stands, and searches did not turn up anything additional, all the coverage is in context to the band. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to
talk) 00:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep I don't read Spanish very well, but based on Tommy Boy's post, he is clearly notable as a stand alone musician. The articles, from the title certainly appear to be discussing him, rather than the band, thus meeting WP:RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- They don't really – they are either wishing him happy birthday as a member of a famous band, being the sole surviving member of a famous band, or being interviewed as the keyboard player of a famous band. In short, all the sources are very much tied to him being part of Los Jaivas, and as far as I'm aware, he hasn't done anything notable outside of the band. Richard3120 (talk) 16:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many of the sources give
significant coverage to Parra. -- Mike 🗩 14:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.