Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums

Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums

Community Resources Against Street Hoodlums (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unneeded fork. Redirect to LAPD John from Idegon (talk) 06:06, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Appears to meet sourcing and notability thresholds. Additionally, The LAPD article is long enough as it is. --
  talk/_contribs) 09:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as this seems acceptable and better as a separate article with no urgent need of deleting. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep- sourcing and notability trheashold meets. --BabbaQ (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems to be enough content here for a stand-alone article. -- œ^™ 17:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.