Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditsudhaar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Creditsudhaar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails
WP:NCORP. References are mentions, general announcements, or industry blogs that aren't reliable. CNMall41 (talk) 23:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note - Using the actual name which shows in most of the online sources (Credit Sudhaar), I see this was previously deleted for being an advert. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the ]
- As it is the article appears to be a Phil Bridger (talk) 09:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)]
- These are the same search results that I used but nothing in those results adds up to WP:CORPDEPTH. There are general announcements, brief mentions, and press releases but nothing in-depth from a reliable source that isn't routine coverage. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)]
- These are the same search results that I used but nothing in those results adds up to
- Delete - The page "Credit sudhaar" was also deleted in November 2015 (the title caps version was deleted in September 2015), then created under this name two months later in January 2016.
Per Phil's comment above, subject seems notable, and needs a balanced rewrite if kept.Pegnawl (talk) 21:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- CNMall is spot on, I mistook Money Life for something more than opinion on first blush. All other results seem to be contributed quotes from execs and passing mentions/lists. Changing Note to Delete. Pegnawl (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete on account of subject failing ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.