Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Adaminte Makan Abu#Reception. Any material worth merging is still available from the article history (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 18:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu

Critical response to Adaminte Makan Abu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's content already exists at

content fork of that section in its own article. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Why wasn't it boldly redirected? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge this with the main article.
Anish Viswa 05:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The page is also orphaned, so I don't see a need to redirect it. –Dream out loud (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fair enough. Also i doubt anyone would bother searching "Critical response to...". Forget the non-regulars, but even regulars to Wikipedia would look for "Accolades received by..." or "List of awards and nominations received by..." kinda format. Deleteing without redirect is also fine. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:18, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 18:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Plus skimming through the view stats I couldn't find more than 30 views on any given day. Most days had less than 10 views. –Dream out loud (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect. Redirects are cheap, and if it helps some people, why not? I have no prejudice against deleting if there is consensus for that as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:07, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with the main article Adaminte Makan Abu. Salih (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.