Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto Aid Israel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Crypto Aid Israel
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Crypto Aid Israel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTNEWS applies 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Organizations, Terrorism, Business, Israel, and Palestine. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 06:22, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: aside from the nom reasons, Iskandar323 (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)]
- (WP:G11 was declined. I cannot be objective, (about the G11ness) but I think it was G11able. came here from Liz's talk.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)]
- Delete: PROMO. This reads like an ad for the effort. Oaktree b (talk) 16:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Cryptowashing of a horrible event should never be entertained here, nor should any kind of aid ever be stuck in a math problem only a computer can solve. ]
- Delete This article definitely looks like some sort of advertisement or promoting a business. Nonetheless, this article doesn't stand to a neutral point of view. Geko72290 (talk) 19:20, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I understand why the speedy was declined, but the sourcing for this initiative isn't there. Star Mississippi 00:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Source analysis shows that it does not satisfy conflict of interest. The source analysis is:
| Reference Number | Reference | Comments | Independent | Significant | Reliable | Secondary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cointelegraph.com | Not independent because it reports on the cryptocurrency community | No | Not really significant about the event because mostly about the cryptocurrency community | ? | No |
| 2 | news.bitcoin.com | Not independent, but significant coverage | No | Yes | ? | No |
| 3 | decrypt.co | Another publication of the cryptocurrency community | No | Not really in enough detail | ? | No |
| 4 | www.cryptoglobe.com | Another publication of the cryptocurrency community | No | No, mostly asks for donations | ? | No |
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Promotional. No evidence of level of in-depth coverage in WP:RS necessary to meet notability requirements. Sourced to unreliable crypocurrency websites. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)]
- There is discussion on my talk page regarding the article. I've requested CSD to the article. Toadette (let's chat together) 06:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.