Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Customers Bank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Customers Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bank with only primary sources. The text appears to be a copy paste direct from homepage. PRehse (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Apparent COI, SPA. Rhadow (talk) 16:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~~~Speedy~~ delete: as a copyvio! (Previous rationale: created by a single purpose account. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Note for admin: if the outcome is delete BankMobile is a redirect which will need to be deleted as well.) Thanks, DrStrauss talk 21:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 08:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 08:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete for lack of notability. Alexius08 (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The copyvio is revertable but this "article" is, and always has been, spam for an unremarkable company. MER-C 08:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.