Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Beaumont

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (

Talk) 12:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Daisy Beaumont

Daisy Beaumont (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress who fails

reliable, independent, in-depth sources beyond "Beaumont has a part on show X" articles like this or this
. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 14:55, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Howicus (apologies if this is the wrong place to discuss this, if so, advise me and I will submit my argument elsewhere). Daisy Beaumont was a regular in the BAFTA winning (also twice BAFTA nominated) Star Stories, as well as in a regular in two series of the hit series 'You, Me & Them', screened regularly on UK Channel UK Gold.
She is a regular face on British television, and many of her screen roles can be found at her IMDB page, here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0064584/.
She also has extensive theatre credits, has performed at the National Theatre in London, several times in the West End, and was one of the original cast of the hit Boeing-Boeing (as is mentioned in the wikipedia article for the musical here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing-Boeing_(play). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanevacca (talk • contribs)
She's been in a lot of notable TV programmes, but there's still not significant coverage about her- so far I've managed to add 2 articles from the Metro about her, and the Metro isn't a great source. Unfortunately, there's no depth of coverage about her, and unless someone finds any, I don't believe she passes
WP:ACTRESS, so Delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi. Ok, I understand that. What counts as notable coverage? Does this count, for example? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanevacca (talk • contribs)
That last link just has a photo of the actress, so that's not significant coverage.
WP:GNG explains what "significant coverage" means. –anemoneprojectors– 17:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Further coverage of Daisy Beaumont:
TV etc
Theatre
Daisy is a very experienced and successful theatre actress, which is tricky because theatre receives less media coverage than TV and film work. Much of such coverage is in reviews, some of which I have posted below. Daisy is mentioned significantly in all.
RoxaneVacca Roxanevacca (talk) talk
Although you say pictures are not significant coverage, this: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/star-stories is the official page for the Channel 4 series 'Star Stories' in which Daisy starred. Her image is in the icon of almost every episode on that page, which proves the significance of her presence in the show.
Another cast announcement featuring Daisy, this time in the Express: http://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/tv-radio/103748/MUMBAI-CALLING — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxanevacca (talk • contribs) 13:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Talk) 14:30, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep per Roxanevacca & Tomwsulcer's findings - Passes GNG. –Davey2010Talk 18:02, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -
    WP:GNG, with a filmography to illustrate that. After all, it is a Stub, so we know it needs improvement. It's come a long way from its original 2007 unsourced, two-sentence creation. — Maile (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daisy_Beaumont&oldid=1137463822"