Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DanTDM Creates a Big Scene
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to DanDTM. As content was merged, the redirect has to be kept. In the future, please do not merge content until an AfD is complete. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 05:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
DanTDM Creates a Big Scene
No evidence of any notability. Refs are YuTube and blogs. Nothing independent and reliable, Fails
]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Dan is one of the rich and popular youtubers so notable, this series is not. The refs don't support this article, they are trivial in 3 cases with the 4th being a freelance report which while in depth doesn't have editorial oversight. I googled and came up with a similar scenario, trivial mentions but nothing to support gng. My son watches him regularly so I get to see a lot of him too - he's long since moved on to different stuff. Szzuk (talk) 12:45, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as above. YouTubers make all sorts of web series. This one doesn't have the episode critiquing or the independent sources to meet notability in television, only announcements that such a series exist. Looks like it was merged into a paragraph. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.